Tima version:
LHS version:DeltaTima version:GeometryServer version:FMS type:
Client:
Diagnosis and Solution: After a load, at the moment it becomes visible in TIMA, there may be doubts about whether the indicators correspond to the solids displayed. You may see many extracted areas, but the indicators show low values that make us doubt, whether for the weekly or monthly cycle.
It can be verified with a conciliation in Delta.
Case: weekly cycle
Necessary inputs: real initial topography (from the beginning of the cycle to be evaluated), mined topography (topografía fresada) and plan solids.
To obtain the mined topography, it must be downloaded from the MinIO, at the following address:
"server geométrico de la faena"/STA/Output/"fecha actual a analizar"/TopoGPS/pieces
Theonciliation is performed in Delta and compared with what is observed in TIMA.
It is observed that the indicator of adherence to the plan, obtained from Delta, it is almost the same as we see on TIMA, therefore, it is concluded that the indicators shown coincide with the solids. In case this does not happen, it must be reported to the geometric team, since there could be problems with the "fresado". Note that the total extraction shown does not match the sum of the extractions separately in Delta. This behavior is expected, given the way in which Delta discretizes solids. In this case, the "real information" or the one that TIMA uses to show the "movimiento mina", is the total extraction.
case: monthly cycle
Necessary inputs: Monthly beginning topography (to use it as real and planned), current cycle week topography (as real ending topography) and monthly ending topography (as planned ending).
Followe the same procedure described for the case of the weekly cycle.